Hair loss in children hospitalized for malignant diseases treatment is most visible manifestation that dramatically influences their later selfconfidence. Further, this could strongly affect possible development of psychic crisis. Scientific researches on motivational aspects of involvement for provision of non-formal categories of support to patients with malignant diseases are infrequent. Therefore, this topic should be more investigated in future. Humanitarian initiative “Kilometer of hair”, as unique philanthropic activity at territory of Serbia in year 2015, had as an aim to collect hair for preparation of wigs for children treated for malignant diseases. The main question in our study was definition of key motives for hair donation. We classified three main groups of motives. Altruism was detected as motivation in almost one-half of all interviewed subjects. Second group included almost one third of all subjects and their main motivation for hair donation was empathy. The smallest percentage of hair donors was motivated with some kind of public approval and welcome from society. We believe that further research in this area could give some directives for program planning of further improvement of social awareness for psychosocial support to children with malignant diseases.
Guiddi P, Alfieri S, Saturni M, V. New donors, loyal donors, and regular donors. Which motivations sustain blood donation? Transfusion and Apheresis Science. 2015;(3):339–44.
2.
Michie M, Henderson G, Garrett J, Smith C, G. If i could in a small way help": motivations for and beliefs about sample donation for genetic research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics. 2011;(2):57–70.
3.
Wang S, Fridinger F, Sheedy K, Khoury M. Public Attitudes regarding the donation and storage of blood specimens for genetic research. Community Genetics. 2001;(1):18–26.
4.
Stukas A, Snyder M, Clary E. The Effects of “Mandatory Volunteerism” on Intentions to Volunteer. Psychological Science. 1999;(1):59–64.
5.
Lee L, Piliavin J, Call V. Giving Time, Money, and Blood: Similarities and Differences. Social Psychology Quarterly. 1999;(3):276–90.
6.
Reed A, Aquino K, Levy E. Moral Identity and Judgments of Charitable Behaviors. Journal of Marketing. 2007;(1):178–93.
7.
Winterich K, Mittal V, Ross W. Donation Behavior toward In-Groups and Out-Groups: The Role of Gender and Moral Identity. Journal of Consumer Research. 2011;(2):199–214.
8.
Hibbert S, Smith A, Davies A, Ireland F. Guilt appeals: Persuasion knowledge and charitable giving. Psychol Mark. 2007;(8):723–42.
9.
Small D, Loewenstein G, Slovic P. Sympathy and callousness: The impact of deliberative thought on donations to identifiable and statistical victims. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 2007;(2):143–53.
10.
Labroo A, Mukhopadhyay A. Lay Theories of Emotion Transience and the Search for Happiness: A Fresh Perspective on Affect Regulation. Journal of Consumer Research. 2009;(2):242–54.
11.
Ye N, Teng L, Yu Y, Wang Y. The effect of donation outcomes on donation behavior. Journal of Business Research. 2015;(3):480–6.
12.
Misje A, Bosnes V, Gasdal O, Heier H. Motivation, recruitment and retention of voluntary non-remunerated blood donors: a survey-based questionnaire study. Vox Sang. 2005;(4):236–44.
13.
Karacan E, Seval C, Aktan G, Ayli Z, Palabiyikoglu M, R. Blood donors and factors impacting the blood donation decision: motives for donating blood in Turkish sample. Transfusion and Apheresis Science. 2013;(3):468–73.
14.
Otto P, Bolle F. Multiple facets of altruism and their influence on blood donation. The Journal of Socio-Economics. 2011;(5):558–63.
15.
Saunders B. Altruism or solidarity? The motives for organ donation and two proposals. Bioethics. 2012;(7):376–81.
16.
Davis M, Hall J, Meyer M. The First Year: influences on the satisfaction, involvement, and persistence of new community volunteers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2003;(2):248–60.
17.
Einolf C. Empathic concern and prosocial behaviors: A test of experimental results using survey data. Social Science Research. 2008;(4):1267–79.
18.
Davis M, Mitchell K, Hall J, Lothert J, Snapp T, Meyer M. Empathy, expectations, and situational preferences: personality influences on the decision to participate in volunteer helping behaviors. Journal of Personality. 1999;(3):469–503.
19.
Penner L. Dispositional and Organizational Influences on Sustained Volunteerism: An Interactionist Perspective. J Social Issues. 2002;(3):447–67.
20.
Batson C, Ahmad N, Yin J, Bedell S, Johnson J, Templin C. Two Threats to the Common Good: Self-Interested Egoism and Empathy-Induced Altruism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1999;(1):3–16.
21.
Bednall T, Bove L. Donating Blood: a meta-analytic review of self-reported motivators and deterrents. Transfusion Medicine Reviews. 2011;(4):317–34.
Citation
Copyright
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.