Indirect laryngoscopic surgery for benign vocal fold lesions: a preliminary report

Ognjen Čukić
Ognjen Čukić
Contact Ognjen Čukić

Department of Otorhinolaryngology with Maxillofacial Surgery, Clinical Hospital Center “Zemun-Beograd” , Beograd , Serbia

Published: 01.07.2017.

Volume 33, Issue 2 (2017)

pp. 1528-1534;

https://doi.org/10.5937/MatMed1702528C

Abstract

The current practice for removal of benign vocal fold lesions is microlaryngoscopy under general anaesthesia. The technique provides excellent magnification with use of operating microscope and enables the surgeon to work with both hands at the same time. However, in certain cases the technique of indirect laryngoscopic surgery under local epimucous anaesthesia can be used as an alternative. In this article we will give the brief historic perspective of the procedure, indications and technical description, as well as its advantages and limitations. Given the fact that technique is not widely accepted by otolaryngologists, the author will also share some personal remarks on this relatively simple procedure.

Keywords

References

1.
Mackenzie K. Chronic laryngitis. In: Scott-Brown’s Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery.
2.
Milutinović Z. Klinički atlas poremećaja glasa - teorija i praksa. Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva.
3.
Zeitels SM, Healy GB. Laryngology and phonosurgery. N Engl J Med. 349:882–92.
4.
Kleinsasser O. Mikrolaryngoskopie und Endolaryngeale Mikrochirurgie.
5.
Bouchayer M, Cornut G. Microsurgical treatment of benign vocal fold lesions: indications, technique, results. Folia Phoniatr (Basel. 44(3–4):155–84.

Citation

Copyright

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles

Partners