The duration of the postoperative period in patients with associated fractures of the lower leg and ankle

Branislav Vracevic ,
Branislav Vracevic
Dejan Ristic ,
Dejan Ristic
Nebojsa Jovanovic ,
Nebojsa Jovanovic
Aleksandar Stankovic ,
Aleksandar Stankovic
Biljana Stankovic ,
Biljana Stankovic
Voja Cvetkovic ,
Voja Cvetkovic
Aleksandar Vojvodic ,
Aleksandar Vojvodic
Zoran Rosic ,
Zoran Rosic
Edin Redzepagic ,
Edin Redzepagic
Marko Zunic
Marko Zunic

Published: 01.12.2012.

Biochemistry

Volume 29, Issue 1 (2013)

pp. 808-812;

https://doi.org/10.5937/matmed1301808v

Abstract

Fractures in the level of the ankle are among the most common fractures. A separate entity is associated fractures at the level of the ankle joint with fractures of the lower leg. The aim is to determine what the impact of certain preoperative factors [length preoperative period, the complications of surgical treatment and antibiotics] the length of postoperative hospital stays. This retrospective study included patients were treated surgically with associated fracture of the lower leg and ankle in the Department of Orthopedics and grammatology KBC Zemun between 2003rd by 2011. and were divided into three groups according to the duration of preoperative hospital stay. The length of postoperative hospital stay significantly affect the time to completion of the operation (ρ = 0.405, p <0.01) for the occurrence of complications (ρ = 0.465, p <0.01) and duration of antibiotic use (ρ = 0.580, p <0, 01). The average length of hospital stay in patients with complications was 19 registered (Med 18) days, whereas in patients without complications 10 registered (Med 9) days. There was a statistically significant difference in the length of hospital recovery compared to various complications (log rank = 35.74, DF = 5, p <0, 01). It is these fractures that previously disposed of as such a treatment leads to less frequent complications, a shorter stay in hospital patients and therefore lower costs of the treatment.

Keywords

References

1.
Keros P, Kargovska-Klisarova. Malobabić s; donji ekstremitet, Naučna knjiga-Beograd. 1989;134–8.
2.
Lešić A, Hristić D, Ukropina D, Bumbaširević M. Experimental model of tne ankle joint injury. acta Orth. Iugosl. 1999;(1):33–6.
3.
Wilson F. Fractures and dislocations of the ankle In: rockwood Cha, Green dP. Fractures in adults. Lippincot company. 1984;1663–99.
4.
Müller E, Willenegger M, H. Udžbenik osteosinteze aO-metoda, jugoslavenska medicinska naklada. 1981;282–300.
5.
James La. Timing of operative intervention in the menagement of actuely fractured ankles and the cost implications. Injuri. 2001;469–72.
6.
Michelson Jd. Curent concepts renew fractures about of the ankle j Bone and joint surg. 1995;(1):142–52.
7.
Konrating K, Watson Jt M, Br, Cramer K. Early versus delayed tretman of severe ankle fractures a coparasion of results j. Orthop Trauma. 1995;(5):377–80.
8.
Pietzik P, Quershi I, Langdon J. Molloy sm solan M. Cost benefit with early operative fixation of unstable ankle fractures ann r. Coll surg Engl. 2006;(4):405–7.
9.
Bk M, Melsen P. Epidemiology of ankle fractures. a prospective population based study of 212 cases in aalborg denmark acta Orthoped scand. 1998;48–50.
10.
Gr F, Morrey B. delayed OrIF of ankle fractures. Clin Orthoped. 1987;187–95.
11.
Grielend Rv, Michelson Jd, Bone L. Fractures of the ankles and the distal part of the tibia j. Bone joint surg. 1996;1772–83.
12.
Hoiness P. The influence of the timing of surgery on soft tissue complications and hospital stay. a review of 84 closed ankles fractures acta Chir Gynaecol. 2000;(1):6–9.
13.
Breederveld rs, von straaten j, Patka P, von Monrik jC. Immediate or delayed operative treatment of fractures of the ankle. autor za korespondenciju: dr Branislav Đ Vracević sime Igumanova. 1988;436–8.

Citation

Copyright

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles

Partners