Taurunum Medical Journal
Sign in
Issue image

More articles from Volume 27, Issue 1, 2011

OrIGINaLNI radOVI OrIGINaL arTICLEs Pathologic findings and clinical outcome in patients undergoing retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy after multiple chemorherapy regimens for metastatic nonseminomatous testicular tumors

OrIGINaLNI radOVI OrIGINaL arTICLEs Praktični aspekti serološkog testiranja D weak fenotipa

Value of preoperativne levels CEA and CA 19-9 tumor markers in patients with colorectal carcinoma compering with number of lymph node metastasis

Schwanomas and Meningiomas -The most common tumors in CPA and clinical significance

OrIGINaLNI radOVI OrIGINaL arTICLEs Pure testicular teratoma in adults: experience in the treatment of 49 consecutive cases

Article views


{{ submission.title }}

OrIGINaLNI radOVI OrIGINaL arTICLEs Praktični aspekti serološkog testiranja D weak fenotipa

Andrijana Kulic ,
Andrijana Kulic
View authors publications

Search this author on:

PubMed | Google Scholar
Vesna Libek ,
Vesna Libek
View authors publications

Search this author on:

PubMed | Google Scholar
Ana Strugar
Ana Strugar
View authors publications

Search this author on:

PubMed | Google Scholar

Published: 01.12.2010.

Biochemistry

Volume 27, Issue 1 (2011)

pp. 203-207;

https://doi.org/10.5937/matmed1101203k

Abstract

Keywords

d weak antigen,

rh fenotip,

antid test serumi,

aglutinacijski skor

References

1.
Veljković M. Imunobiološki i klinički značaj krvnih grupa. Inra Net Communication Beograd. 2009;151.
2.
Wagner F, Gassner C, Muller T. Molecular basis of weak d phenotypes. Blood. 1999;385–93.
3.
Ansart-Pirenne H, Bonnet M, Pennec L, Roussel P, Patereau M, C. Noizat-Pirenne F. rhd variants in Caucasians: consequences for checking clinically relevant alleles. Transfusion. 2004;1282–6.
4.
Garratty G. do we need to be more concerned about weak d antigens? Transfusion. 2005;1547–51.
5.
Denomme Ga, Wagner F, Bj F, Li W, Wa F. Partial d, weak d types, and novel RHD alleles among 33,864 multiethnic patients: implications for anti-d alloimmunization and prevention. Transfusion. 2005;1154–60.
6. :
271–87.
7.
Marsh W. scoring of hemagglutination reactions. Transfusion. 1972;352.
8.
Denomme Ga, Dake Lr V, Di L, Judd W. rh discrepancies caused by variable reactivity of partial and weak d types with different serologic techniques. Transfusion. 2008;473–8.
9.
Lai M, Grasso C, Boschi I, Onofrio G, Pascali V, Leone. Characterization of anti-d monoclonal antibody reagents based on their reactivity with the weak d phenotype. Transfusion. 2009;937–42.
10.
Filbey D. selection of monoclonal antibodies for the identification of d variants: ability to detect weak d and to split epd2, epd5 and epd6/7. Vox sang. 1996;173–9.
11.
Williams M. Monoclonal reagents for rhesus-d typing of Irish patients and donors: a review. Br j Biomed sci. 2000;142–93.
12.
Working party of the British Committee for standards in Haematology, Blood transfusion task Force.Guidelines for compatibillity procedures in blood transfusion labaratories. TransfMed. 2004;59–73.
13.
Wa F. How I manage donors and patients with a weak d phenotype. Curr Opin Hematol. 2006;476–83.
14.
Kumpel B. are weak d rBCs really immunogenic? Transfusion. 2006;1062–6.
15.
Noizat-Pirenne F, Ma V, Mercadier A, Bonin P, Peltier-Pujol F, Fialaire-Legendre A. d phenotypes and transfusion safety:where do we stand in daily practice. Transfusion. 2007;1616–20.
16.
jovanović-srzentić. aktuelni pristup rešavanju problema u imunohematološkoj praksi. Bilten za transfuziologiju. 2006;

Citation

Copyright

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles

Partners
TT Medik
Google Schoolar
DOAJ