Correlation between preoperative and postoperative stage of cervical cancer

Mirko Mackic ,
Mirko Mackic
Contact Mirko Mackic

Gynecology and Obstetrics Clinic Narodni Front , Belgrade , Serbia

Milan Perovic ,
Milan Perovic

Gynecology and Obstetrics Clinic Narodni Front , Belgrade , Serbia

Stefan Ivanovic ,
Stefan Ivanovic

Gynecology and Obstetrics Clinic Narodni Front , Belgrade , Serbia

Ninoslav Dejanovic
Ninoslav Dejanovic

Gynecology and Obstetrics Clinic Narodni Front , Belgrade , Serbia

Published: 01.01.2020.

Volume 36, Issue 1 (2020)

pp. 1836-1840;

Abstract

Reliable preoperative staging of cervical cancer is important to evaluate and compare the results of different therapeutic modalities, including, surgical treatment, chemotherapy and radiation therapy. The diagnostic reliability of preoperative staging of cervical cancer by cervical biopsy and endocervical curettage was evaluated by a retrospective diagnostic study. The results of this preoperative staging were compared with the stage of cancer set on the basis of histopathological examination of the samples. Only patients who were clinically staged as early (operable) to the disease stage were included in the study. Postoperative diagnosis in 98 patients was exocervical cancer, in 12 endocervical cancer in 5 it was H-SIL (CIN III), and in 4 patients it was chronic cervicitis. The diagnostic reliability of preoperative staging of cervical cancer by cervical biopsy and endocervical curettage was 76.9%. In order to reduce errors in the staging of cervical cancer, it is advised that it be performed in specialized cancer centers by an experienced oncology gynecologist.

Keywords

References

1.
Bhatla N, Aoki D, Sharma DN, Sankaranarayanan R. Cancer of the cervix uteri. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. Oct;143(Suppl 2):22–36.
2.
Cibula D, Potter R, Planchamp F, Avall-Lundqvist E, Fischerova D, Haie Meder C, et al. The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology/European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology/ European Society of Pathology Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Cervical Cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 28:641–55.
3.
Pecorelli S, Zigliani L, Odicino F. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 105(2):107–8.
4.
Averette HE, Ford JH, Dudan RC, Girtanner RE, Hoskins WJ, Lutz MH. Staging of cervical cancer. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology. 18(3):215–32.
5.
Benedet J, Bender H, Jones H, Ngan HY, Pecorelli S. FIGO staging classifications and clinical practice guidelines in the management of gynecologic cancers. FIGO Committee on Gynecologic Oncology International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 70(2):209–62.
6.
Anfinan N. Cervical Cancer Staging in Saudi Arabia Clinicoradiological Correlation. BioMed Research International. 2019;2019:1–4.
7.
Querleu D, Cibula D, Abu-Rustum NR. Update on the Querleu-Morrow Classification of Radical Hysterectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 24(11):3406–12.
8.
Griffin TW, Parker RG, Taylor WJ. An evaluation of procedures used in staging carcinoma of the cervix. American Journal of Roentgenology. 127(5):825–7.
9.
Ho C, Chien T, Jeng C, Tsang Y, Shih B, Chang S. Staging of cervical cancer: comparison between magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography and pelvic examination under anesthesia. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association. 91(10):982–90.
10.
Chung CK, Nahhas WA, Zaino R, Stryker JA, Mortel R. Histologic grade and lymph node metastasis in squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. Gynecologic Oncology. 12(3):348–54.
11.
Boss EA, Barentsz JO, Massuger LFAG, Boonstra H. The role of MR imaging in invasive cervical carcinoma. European Radiology. 10(2):256–70.
12.
Joly-Lobbedez F. Evidence based of chemoradiotherapy in cervix carcinoma. Cancer Radiothérapie. 13(6–7):503–6.

Citation

Copyright

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles

Partners