OrIGINaLNI radOVI OrIGINaL arTICLEs Retrospective analysis of perioperative mortality after retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for nonseminomatous testicular tumors

Djordje Argirovic ,
Djordje Argirovic
Aleksandar Argirovic
Aleksandar Argirovic

Published: 01.12.2010.

Biochemistry

Volume 27, Issue 4 (2011)

pp. 345-351;

https://doi.org/10.5937/matmed1104345a

Abstract

The present study is performed to determine whether retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy (RPLA) perioperative mortality (PM) rates reported from center of excellence [Indiana University: 0% for primary and 0.8% for postchemotherapy (PC) RPLA] are applicable to institution at large. Between 1975 and 2005, 327 assessable patients with nonseminomatous testicular tumors (NSTT) were treated with RPLA: primary in 134 (41%) and PC-RPLA in 193 (59%) patients. The observed PM rates were stratified according to age, clinical stage (CS) and type of RPLA. The median age at RPLA was 28 years (range 16-54) : < 29 years in 194 (56.3%), 30-39 years in 90 (30.3%) and > 40 years in 44 (13.4%) patients. Of 327 RPLA patients, 81 (27.8%) were performed for localized (CS-I), 179 (54.7%) for regional (CS-II) and 57 (17.5%) for metastatic (CS-III) disease. Ten (3.1%) patients died during initial 90 days after RPLA: 1 patient from pulmonary embolism, 2 of chemotherapyrelated toxicity and 7 of progressive disease due to preoperative worse prognostic factors. Of the entire cohort 30, 60 and 90-day PM rate was 0.3%, 1.0% and 1.3%, respectively. PM rate increase with increasing age: < 39 years 0%, 30-39 years 5.0% and > 40 years 9.3% (x2 trend test, P=0.002). PM rate also increased with CS: 0% localized, 2.8% for regional and 8.8% for metastatic disease (x2 trend test, p<0.001). PM rate at primary and PC-RPLA was increased with CS: 0% localized, 2.8% for regional and 8.8% for metastatic disease (x2 trend test, p<0.001). PM rate at primary and PC-RPLA was 0.7% and 3.1% 9P<0.001). RPLA was associated with virtually no or low (2.8%) PM rate in patients with localized and regional disease, respectively. In contrast, the PM rate of 8.8% for patients with distant metastases and group > 40 years of age (9.3%) implies that RPLA for these patients should be performed at centers of excellence, with intent of reducing PM rate.

Keywords

References

1.
Heidenreich A, Ohlmann C, Hegele. repeat retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy in advanced testicular cancer. Eur Urol. 2005;54–71.
2.
Management of clinical stage a, B1 and B2 with nonseminomatous testicular tumors upfront retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy. Eur Urol. 2009;624.
3.
Motzer Rj, Bolger G, Boston B. Testicular cancer: clinical practice guidelines in oncology. Natl Compr Cancer New. 2006;1038–58.
4.
Albers P, F. Guidelines on testicular cancer. Eur Urol. 2005;885–94.
5.
Van As Nj G, Dc, Money-Kyrle J. Evidence-based pragmatic guidelines for the follow-up of testicular cancer: optimizing the detection of relapse. Urol. 2007;500–3.
6.
Lowrance W, Ms C, Clark P. assessing retroperitoneal lymph node dissection: does it still have a role in the management of clinical stage I nonseminomatous testis cancer? a European perspective. Eur Urol. 2008;1008–15.
7.
Heidenreich A, Thuer D, Polyakov S. Post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in advanced germ cell tumours of the testis. Eur Urol. 2008;260–72.
8.
Heidenreich W. Laparascopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection: does it still have a role in the management of clinical stage I nonseminomatous testis cancer: a European perspective. Eur Urol. 2008;260–72.
9.
High risk clinical stage a nonseminomatous testicular tumors: Primary retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy or cisplatin-based chemotherapy? Eur Urol. 2009;507.
10.
Lj. Primary chemotherapy in low clinical stage germ cell testicular tumors: a feasible mode of treatment. Eur Urol. 2010;(6):539.
11.
Chevreau C, Mozerolles C, M. Long-term efficacy of two cycles of BEP regimen in high-risk stage I nonseminomatous testicular germ cell tumors with embryonal carcinoma and/or vascular invasion. Eur Urol. 2044;209–14.
12.
High risk clinical stage a nonseminomatous testicular tumors: patterns of recurrence and outcome of treatment. Urology. 2007;164.
13.
Primary retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy or cisplatin-based chenmotherapy in clinical stage B1/B2 neseminomatous testicular tumors: Long-term results of the prospective non-randomized study. Eur Urol Meet. 2007;(7):137.
14.
Weissbach L, Maatz R, Flechtner B, H. rPLNd or primary chemotherapy in clinical stage IIa/B nonseminomatous germ cell tumors. results of a prospective multicenter trial including quality of life assessment. Eur Urol. 2000;582–94.
15.
Baniel J, Foster. Complications of primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. Urol. 1994;582–94.
16.
Baniel J, Foster. Complications of post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. j Urol. 1995;976–80.
17.
Capitanio U, Perrotte C, P. Population-based study of perioperative mortality after retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for nonseminomatous germ cell tumors. Urology. 2009;(2):373–7.
18.
risks of uncontrolled retroperitoneum. ann surg Oncol. 2003;100–1.
19.
reoperative retroperitoneal surgery. Urol Clin North amer. 2007;227–30.
20.
Baniel. Complications of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in testicular cancer: primary and postchemotherapy. semin surg Oncol. 1999;263–7.
21.
Baniel J, Foster. Complications of primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for lowstage testicular cancer. World j Urol. 1994;139–42.
22.
analiza rezultata posthemioterapijske retroperitonealne limfadenektomije kod pacijenata sa intramedijarnim i lošim rizikom neseminomskih tumora testisa. Materia Medica. 2011;352–60.
23.
Patološki nalaz i klinički tok kod pacijenata sa metastazama neseminomskih testikularnih tumora kod kojih je primenjena retroperitonealna limfadenektomija posle multiplih hemoterapija. Materia Medica. 2011;195–202.
24.
E-Mail.

Citation

Copyright

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles

Partners