More articles from Volume 28, Issue 1, 2012
OrIGINaLNI radOVI OrIGINaL arTICLEs Reactive pleural effusion
OrIGINaLNI radOVI OrIGINaL arTICLEs Immunoexpression of Cathepsin D in primary and recidivant meningiomas
Ultrasonographic evaluation of simple ovarian cysts in postmenopausal women ristic r aleksandar, djukic Milan
Assessment of soil pollution in Belgrade
Nefarmakoloska kontrola bola u nespecificnom cervikalnom i lumbalnom sindromu
Article views
Citations
0
OrIGINaLNI radOVI OrIGINaL arTICLEs Immunoexpression of Cathepsin D in primary and recidivant meningiomas
Published: 01.12.2011.
Biochemistry
Volume 28, Issue 1 (2012)
pp. 397-404;
Abstract
The present study was performed to establish the socioepidemiological caracteristics (mean age, male to female ratio), the prevalence of various histological types of meningiomas in the groups of primary and recidivant tumors as well as Cathepsin D immunoexpression. We analysed 50 patients with primary and recidivant intracranial and intraspinal meningiomas who underwent surgery in KBC Zemun during the year 2004, with a two years follow-up. All surgical specimen were evaluated for histologic type of tumor and representative slides were immunostained with the anti-Cathepsin D antibody. In both primary and recidivant meningioma groups the number of mitosis, as factor tumor agressivness, was counted on 10 and 20 HPF and those results were statistically analyzed. A considerable difference was found when the number of mitosis and the histologic tumor grade have been compared with the Cathepsin D immunoexpression. The result lead to conlusion that the immunopositivity of Cathepsin D decreases with higher mitosis count and higher tumor grade.
Keywords
References
Citation
Copyright
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Article metrics
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.