More articles from Volume 29, Issue 2, 2013
Correlation of maternal BMI with fetal liver ultrasound measurements in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus
Sensitivity of Elevated C-Reactive Protein serum levels in Diagnosis of Chorioamnionitis among pregnant women with gestational diabetes
Anxiety state of the pregnant women in Serbia with gestational diabetes mellitus class A1
ORIGINALNI RADOVI Hypertensive syndrome in pregnacy -how to predict
Pre and post test HAMA scores in women undergoing oral glucose challenge test
Article views
Pre and post test HAMA scores in women undergoing oral glucose challenge test
Published: 01.12.2012.
Biochemistry
Volume 29, Issue 2 (2013)
pp. 852-855;
Abstract
The 50-gram non-fasting one hour Glucose Challenge Test (GCT) is today the one most widely implemented as a screening test for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM). Positive result of GCT creates a preliminary GDM diagnosis. Diagnosis of GDM labels a pregnancy high risk. Any highrisk pregnancy can cause maternal anxiety. The aim of the study was to investigate pretest and posttest anxiety levels in pregnant women undergoing GCT. Anxiety levels were evaluated by Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAMA score). Pretest HAMA score was 7.1±3.34 in the women with preliminary GDM diagnosis, and 6.69±5.51 in the women with negative GCT results. After delivering GCT results, HAMA score was 8.64 ± 8.10 in the women with preliminary GDM diagnosis and 4.29±2.29 in the women without preliminary GDM diagnosis. Pretest levels of anxiety among all pregnant women undergoing GCT were increased. However, this was temporary in women with negative GCT, whose anxiety levels decreased after delivering GCT results. Among women preliminary diagnosed with GDM, posttest HAMA evaluation revealed sustained increased levels of anxiety. Concerns regarding the anxiety caused by screening for GDM were confirmed by the results of our study
Keywords
References
Citation
Copyright
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Article metrics
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.