Forensic and legal aspects of mistakes in the work of pathologists

Savic Slobodan ,
Savic Slobodan
Milenkovic Sanja
Milenkovic Sanja

Published: 01.12.2013.

Biochemistry

Volume 30, Issue 2 (2014)

pp. 1147-1160;

https://doi.org/10.5937/matmed1402147s

Abstract

The same legal regulations applied for medical doctors involved in patients treatment, also refer to doctors that do not manage therapy, but whose professional activity is essential for providing adequate diagnostics. this group of professionals include pathologists, which is proven by the actual forensic practice. In modern medicine, the role of pathologists is of extreme importance in the diagnostics of many diseases. In this paper, based on presentation of particular cases from the forensic practice and literature data, the possible forms of mistakes in the work of pathologists and their associates are shown, as well as the causes and the consequences of such mistakes, together with the characteristics of the legal procedures and the significance of adequate medicolegal expertise in these cases.

Keywords

References

1.
Savić S. Krivična dela u vezi sa obavljanjem lekarske delatnosti. Materia Medica. 2010;(1):43–51.
2.
Ong B, Looi L. Medico-legal aspects of histopathology practice. Malays J Pathol. 2001;(1):1–7.
3.
Novis D, Gephardt G, Zarbo R. Interinstitutional comparison of frozen section consultation in small hospitals: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 18,532 frozen section consultation diagnoses in 233 small hospitals. College of American Pathologists. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1996;(12):1087–93.
4.
Gephardt G, Zarbo R. Extraneous tissue in surgical pathology: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 275 laboratories. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1996;1009–14.
5.
Troxel D. Medicolegal aspects of error in pathology. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2006;(5):617–9.
6.
Troxel D. An insurer’s perspective on error and loss in pathology. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2005;(10):1234–6.
7.
Troxel D. Trends in pathology malpractice claims. Am J Surg Pathol. 2012;(1):1–5.
8.
Raab S, Grzybicki D, Janosky J, Zarbo R, Meier F, Jensen C, et al. Clinical impact and frequency of anatomic pathology errors in cancer diagnoses. Cancer. 2005;(10):2205–13.
9.
Raab S, Meier F, Zarbo R, Jensen D, Geisinger K, Booth C, et al. The “Big Dog” effect: variability assessing the causes of error in diagnoses of patients with lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006;(18):2808–14.
10.
Nakhleh R, Gephardt G, Zarbo R. Necessity of clinical information in surgical pathology. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1999;(7):615–9.
11.
Novis D. Detecting and preventing the occurrence of errors in the practices of laboratory medicine and anatomic pathology: 15 years’ experience with the College of American Pathologists’ Q-PROBES and Q-TRACKS programs. Clin Lab Med. 2004;(4):965–78.
12.
Leong A, Braye S, Bhagwandeen B. Diagnostic ‚errors’ in anatomical pathology: relevance to Australian laboratories. Pathology. 2006;(6):490–7.
13.
Raab S. Improving patient safety by examining pathology errors. Clin Lab Med. 2004;(4):849–63.

Citation

Copyright

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles

Partners