
More articles from Volume 34, Issue 1, 2018
An immunohistochemical analysis of angiogenic profile in T1 bladder cancer with concomitant carcinoma “in situ”
Crosstalk between NCAM/FGFR and TGF-beta signalings: an in vitro study and evaluation of human kidney biopsies
Primary sinovial sarcoma of the lung - a case report
Hyperostosis frontalis interna: case report
Proliferation marker Ki-67 in early breast cancer
Article views
Proliferation marker Ki-67 in early breast cancer
Clinical Center of Vojvodina , Novi Sad , Serbia
Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad , Novi Sad , Serbia
Oncology Institut of Vojvodina , Sremska Kamenica , Serbia
Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad , Novi Sad , Serbia
Published: 01.04.2018.
Volume 34, Issue 1 (2018)
pp. 9-9;
Abstract
Aim: Determination of cut-off value for Ki67 index, it’s corelation in luminal breast carcinoma with patient’s age, tumor size, histological grade (HG), and expression of estrogen (ER) and progesterone (PR). Introduction: Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease characterized by different morphology, immunohistochemical profile, clinical course and response to applied therapy. Ki67 proliferative index is one of the prognostic and predictive factors, whose methodological determination and analysis are still unstandardized. Material and Methods: Retrospectively, we analysed 120 pathohistological reports of patients who were treated in the period 01.01.2009. until 31.12.2011. at the Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, and to whom immunohistochemistry was proven luminal breast cancer (positive ER and PR, negative HER2), without axillary lymph node metastases. Results: The average patient’s age was 57.42±10.17 years; average tumor size 17.98±6.97mm; recurrence was registered in 8 (6.7%) patients with average recurrence time of 49±20.23 months. “Cut off” Ki67 value of prognostic significance for period without recurrence is 20.75%. For correlation testing χ2 and Kendal τ-b tests were used. It’s shown unsignificant relationship between Ki67 and patient’s age (p=0.401 and p=0.293), as well as the strength of expression ER (p=1.00, p=0.957) and PR (p=0.273, p=0.189). Significant correlation is present for Ki67 with size (p=0.035, p=0.20) and tumor’s HG (p=0.041, p=0.20). Conclusion: Breast carcinoma is heterogeneous disease, so it’s difficult to predict its course and outcome using standard histopathological factors and biomarkers. For prognostic-predictive purposes, it’s necessary to include additional biomarkers, where Ki67 stands out above all, whose high value correlates with factors of bad prognosis.
Keywords
Citation
Copyright
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Article metrics
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.