Tumors of the uterus

Svetlana Milenkovic
Svetlana Milenkovic

Published: 01.12.2011.

Biochemistry

Volume 28, Issue 2 (2012)

pp. 521-527;

https://doi.org/10.5937/matmed1202521m

Abstract

The latest version of uterine tumors classification was done in 2003. According to WHO classification, endometrial cancers are divided into two groups, so called Type I and Type II. Endometrioid adenocarcinoma has a higher frequency and belongs to Type I. Serous and clear-cell adenocarcinoma, are forming Type II and by definition, they are high grade cancers with poor prognosis and no clearly defined precursors and predisposing risk factors. In Type I, there is a PTEN mutation and in Type II overexpression of p53. These two biomarkers are used in their differential diagnosis.WHO has defined a three-step system in determining the grade of endometrioid adenocarcinoma in which squamous component has no significance. There are other, two-step, grading systems which are not generally accepted.2009 FIGO classification is still in use for tumor staging and according to that tumors confined to the uterus body are divided into stages IA and IB. In the group of mesenchyme tumors, undifferentiated sarcoma was separated, due to different morphology and immunohistochemical profile compared to leiomyoma and endometrial stromal sarcoma. New terms, like UTROSCT, are accepted as well as new theory about the origin of carcinosarcoma. Common believe is that these tumors have epithelial origin and therefore sarcoma component showed positivity on epithelial and mesenchymal markers too. Large number of new antibodies was discovered which in the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of uterine tumors are only meaningful when used in correlation with the clinical picture and morphological data (endometrial carcinoma vs. ovarian carcinoma, adenosarcoma vs. adenofibroma).

References

1.
Devouassoux-Shisheboran M, Genestie C. Pathology of endometrioid carcinoma. Bull Cancer. 2012;(1):7–12.
2.
Tumors of the uterine corpus:epithelialtumours and related conditions. 2003;218.
3.
Lax Sf, Kurman Rj P, Es, Wu L. a binary archictural grading system for uterin endometrial endometrioid carcinoma has superior reproducibility compared FIGO grading and identifies subsets of advanced -stage tumors with favourable and unfavourable prognosis. am j surgPathol. 2000;1201–8.
4.
Precursor lesions of endometrial carcinoma: diagnostic approach and molecular pathology. Pathologe. 2011;(2):255–64.
5.
Oliva E, Clement P, Rh Y. Endometrial stromal nodules and endometrial stromal tumors with limited infiltration:aclinicopathologicstady of 50 cases. am j surgPathol. 2002;567–81.
6.
Clementpb. The pathology of the uterine smooth muscle tumors and mixed endometrial stromal-smooth muscle tumors: a selective review with emphasis on recent advances. Int j GynecolPathol. 2000;39–55.
7.
Hendrickson Mr T, Fa, Kempson Rl. Mesenchymal tumorous and related lesions. 2003;233–44.
8.
Atkins K, Bell S, Kempson Rl H, Mr. Epitheloid smooth muscle tumors of uterus. Mod Pathol. 2002;(1):132.
9.
raniKanthan and jenna-Lynn senger.Uterine Carcinosarcomas (Malignant Mixed MüllerianTumours): a review with special Emphasis on the Controversies in Management. ObstetGynecol Int. 2011;470795.
10.
Cj Z, Hj N. adenofibroma and adenosarcoma oh the uterus: a clinicopathologic study of 35 cases. Cancer. 1981;354–66.

Citation

Copyright

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles

Partners