Taking, processing sampling and evaluation of the adequacy of the samples in lung cytopathology

Milosav Kiurski
Milosav Kiurski

Published: 01.12.2012.

Biochemistry

Volume 29, Issue 4 (2013)

pp. 971-976;

https://doi.org/10.5937/matmed1304971k

Abstract

The conventional cytology has a longstanding role in the diagnostics of primary and metastatic lung carcinoma. Multiple factors have influence on the choice of technique used: for example, the location of the lesion, its size, interpretation of the radiological imaging, the seriousness of the symptoms, as well as the manual skill and commitment of the physician to certain technique. In this paper, the most important sampling techniques and sample processing are shown as the most important factors of a successful pathohistological analysis.

Keywords

References

1.
Koss LG, Melamed MR. *Koss’ Diagnostic Cytology and Its Histopathologic Bases*. 2006.
2.
Piaton E, Djelid D, Duvert B, Perrichon M, Saugier B. Sequential use of bronchial aspirates, biopsies and washings in the preoperative management of lung cancers. *CytoJournal*. 2007;4(11).
3.
Erozan YS, Ramzy I. *Pulmonary Cytopathology*. 2009.
4.
Greenberg SD. Recent advances in pulmonary cytopathology. *Hum Pathol*. 1993;14:901–12.
5.
Ng ABP, Horak GC. Factors significant in the diagnostic accuracy of lung cytology in bronchial washing and sputum: I. Bronchial washings *Acta Cytol*. 1983;27:391–6.

Citation

Copyright

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles

Partners