The conventional cytology has a longstanding role in the diagnostics of primary and metastatic lung carcinoma. Multiple factors have influence on the choice of technique used: for example, the location of the lesion, its size, interpretation of the radiological imaging, the seriousness of the symptoms, as well as the manual skill and commitment of the physician to certain technique. In this paper, the most important sampling techniques and sample processing are shown as the most important factors of a successful pathohistological analysis.
Alonso P, Sanchez S, Ramirez E, Cicero R. Transthoracic needle biopsy in neoplastic and non-neoplastic pathology: Experience in a general hospital. *Diagn Cytopathol*. 1986;2:284–9.
2.
Rosenthal DL, Wallace JM. Fine-needle aspiration of pulmonary lesions via fiberoptic bronchoscopy. *Acta Cytol*. 1984;28:203–10.
3.
Wang KP, Brower R, Haponik EF, Siegelman S. Flexible transbronchial needle aspiration for staging of bronchogenic carcinoma. *Chest*. 1983;84:571–6.
4.
Wang KP, Brower R, Haponik EF, Siegelman S. Flexible transbronchial needle aspiration for staging of bronchogenic carcinoma. *Chest*. 1983;84:571–6.
5.
Wang KP, Terry P, Marsh B. Bronchoscopic needle aspiration biopsy of paratracheal tumors. *Am Rev Respir Dis*. 1978;118:17–21.
6.
Zarbo RJ, Fenoglio-Preiser CM. Interinstitutional data base for comparison of performance in lung fine-needle aspiration cytology: A College of American Pathologists Q-Probe study of 5,264 cases with histologic correlation. *Arch Pathol Lab Med*. 1992;116:463–70.
7.
Johnston WW. Percutaneous fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the lung: A study of 1,015 patients. *Acta Cytol*. 1984;28:218–24.
8.
Caya JG, Clowry LJ, Wollenberg NJ, Tien TM. Transthoracic fine-needle aspiration cytology: Analysis of 82 patients with detailed verification criteria and evaluation of false-negative cases. *Am J Clin Pathol*. 1984;82:100–3.
9.
Bocking A, Close KC, Kyll HJ, Hauptmann S. Cytologic versus histologic evaluation of needle biopsy of the lung. hilum and mediastinum *Acta Cytol*. 1995;39:463–71.
10.
Koss LG, Melamed MR. *Koss’ Diagnostic Cytology and Its Histopathologic Bases*. 2006.
11.
Johnston WW. Fine needle aspiration biopsy versus sputum and bronchial material in the diagnosis of lung cancer: A comparative study of 168 patients. *Acta Cytol*. 1988;32:641–8.
12.
Chamberlain DW, Braude AC, Rebuck AS. A critical evaluation of bronchoalveolar lavage: Criteria for identifying unsatisfactory specimens. *Acta Cytol*. 1987;31:599–605.
13.
Ng ABP, Horak GC. Factors significant in the diagnostic accuracy of lung cytology in bronchial washing and sputum samples: II. Sputum samples *Acta Cytol*. 1983;27:397–402.
14.
Ng ABP, Horak GC. Factors significant in the diagnostic accuracy of lung cytology in bronchial washing and sputum: I. Bronchial washings *Acta Cytol*. 1983;27:391–6.
15.
Greenberg SD. Recent advances in pulmonary cytopathology. *Hum Pathol*. 1993;14:901–12.
16.
Erozan YS, Ramzy I. *Pulmonary Cytopathology*. 2009.
17.
Piaton E, Djelid D, Duvert B, Perrichon M, Saugier B. Sequential use of bronchial aspirates, biopsies and washings in the preoperative management of lung cancers. *CytoJournal*. 2007;4(11).
Citation
Copyright
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
