Esser L. Overview of the 2003 aCOG survey of Professional Liability. aCOG Clinical review. 2004;(1):13–6.
2.
american College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. survey of professional liability. 2003;
3.
Overview of professional liability. Clin Perinatol. 2007;227–32.
4.
Maclennan a. a template for defining a causal relation between acute intrapartum events and cerebral palsy: international consensus statement. BMj. 1999;1054–9.
5.
Cowan R, Rutherford M, Groenendaal F. Origin and timing of brain lesions in term infants with neonatal encephalopathy. Lancet. 2003;736–42.
6.
Müller M, Paribello F, Faa. Neonatal asphyxia and forensic medicine. Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009;54–6.
7.
Kos M, Leniček T. Osnove patologije posteljice. Medicinska Naklada. 2011;
8.
Altshuler G. some placental considerations in alleged obstetrical and neonatology malpractice. 1994;27–47.
9.
Baergen Rn. The Placenta as Witness. Clin Perinatol. 2007;393–407.
10.
Altshuler G. College of american Pathologists Conference XIX on the Examination of the Placenta: report of the Working Group on Indications for Placental Examination. arch Pathol Lab Med. 1991;701–3.
11.
Langston C, Kaplan C, Macpherson T. Practice guideline for examination of the placenta: developed by the Placental Pathology Practice Guideline development Task Force of the College of american Pathologists. arch Pathol Lab Med. 1997;449–76.
12.
Hargitai, Marton PM, Cox. Examination of the human placenta. Clin Pathol. 2004;785–92.
13.
Bull ad, Cross ss, james ds, silcocks PB. do pathologists have extrasensory perception? BMj. 1991;1604–5.
14.
Chang K. Pathological examination of the placenta: Raison d’être, clinical relevance and medicolegal utility. singapore Med j. 2009;1123–33.
15.
Sun C, Vo. Belli aj, Viscardi rM. discrepancy in pathologic diagnosis of placental lesions. Pathol Lab Med. 2002;706–9.
16.
Khong T, Sj G. Quality of placental pathology reports. Pediatr dev Pathol. 2003;54–8.
17.
Gimm G. The impact of malpractice liability claims on obstetrical practice patterns. Health serv res. 2010;195–211.
18.
Grant D, Mcinnes M. Malpractice experience and the incidence of cesarean delivery: a physician-level longitudinal analysis. Inquiry. 2004;170–8.
19.
Xu X, Siefert K, Jacobson P. Lori jr, ransom sB The impact of malpractice burden on Michigan obstetriciangynecologists’ career satisfaction. Womens Health Issues. 2008;229–37.
20.
Davies Jm, Posner K, La L, Cheney F, Kb. Liability associated with obstetric anesthesia: a closed claims analysis. anesthesiology. 2009;131–9.
21.
Nelson K. does cesarean delivery prevent cerebral palsy or other neurologic problems of childhood? Obstet Gynecol. 1994;624–30.
22.
Winter, Boyle C, Yeargin-Allsopp M. Trends in the prevalence of cerebral palsy in a population-based study. Pediatrics. 2002;1220–5.
23.
Nelson K. Can we prevent cerebral palsy? N Engl j Med. 2003;1765–9.
24.
Nelson K, Jk G. Causes of cerebral palsy. Curr Opin Pediatr. 1999;487–91.
25.
Kuban K, Leviton. Cerebral palsy. N Engl j Med. 1994;188–95.
26.
Cowan R, Rutherford M, Groenendaal F. Origin and timing of brain lesions in term infants with neonatal encephalopathy. Lancet. 2003;736–42.
27.
Cj W. analysis of 500 obstetric and gynecologic malpractice claims: causes and prevention. am j Obstet Gynecol. 1991;304–6.
28.
’riordan A O. Placental lesions associated with cerebral palsy and neurologic impairment following term birth. arch Pathol Lab Med. 2000;1785–91.
29.
redline rW. severe fetal placental vascular lesions in term infants with neurologic impairment. am j Obstet Gynecol. 2005;452–7.
30.
Viscardi Rm, Sun C. Placental lesion multiplicity: risk factor for IUGr and neonatal cranial ultrasound abnormalities. Early Hum dev. 2001;1–10.
Citation
Copyright
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
