The misues of knoweledge: bioethics and security issues related to synthetic biology

Tatjana Marinković ,
Tatjana Marinković
Veljko Samardžić ,
Veljko Samardžić
Aleksandar Pajić ,
Aleksandar Pajić
Dragan Marinković Orcid logo
Dragan Marinković

Published: 01.12.2017.

Biochemistry

Volume 34, Issue 3 (2018)

pp. 1634-1640;

https://doi.org/10.5937/matmed1802634m

Abstract

The design and construction of new biological systems in the way engineers design electronic or mechanical systems is the primary goal of synthetic biology. The ability to create and modify life forms and easy access to information to do so has raised a number of issues related to ethics and security. In the era of rapid development of biotechnology, and the perception of the consequent risks to the environment and health, the ethics of knowledge becomes a matter of practical significance. The concern about the misuse of knowledge from synthetic biology influences new risk reduction strategies, which can have significant effects on scientific progress. This paper will provide an overview of the main bioethical and biosafety issues of synthetic biology.

Keywords

References

1.
Cello J, Paul AV, Wimmer E. Chemical Synthesis of Poliovirus cDNA: Generation of Infectious Virus in the Absence of Natural Template. Science. 2002;297(5583):1016–8.
2.
Selgelid MJ. A Tale of Two Studies: Ethics, Bioterrorism, and the Censorship of Science. Hastings Center Report. 2007;37(3):35–43.
3.
Council NR. Biotechnology research in an age of terrorism. 2004.
4.
Noyce RS, Evans DH. Synthetic horsepox viruses and the continuing debate about dual use research. PLOS Pathogens. 14(10):e1007025.
5.
Noyce RS, Lederman S, Evans DH. Construction of an infectious horsepox virus vaccine from chemically synthesized DNA fragments. PLOS ONE. 13(1):e0188453.

Citation

Copyright

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles

Partners